but that was quickly corrected by the court. The Court's jurisdiction lies in the Diversity Clause because the plaintiffs and the defendant are from differing states.
That isn't the mistake in this comedy of errors. The first glaring error made by the plaintiffs on this first page is that the Plaintiffs are not all joined in a common cause and at least one of them will probably get dismissed by the court early on. Secondly, it is highly doubtful that pro se litigants can represent the interests of a corporation because it is a non-natural person and therefore must normally be represented by an attorney.
The next serious error is that CCH Consulting LLC is a New Mexico Corporation but is not registered as a Texas Corporation nor as a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the state of Texas as they correctly claim they are doing. There is more, much more but that will have to wait until further pages are revealed.
Motion for injunctive relief page 1
Motion for injunctive relief page 2
Motion for injunctive relief page 3
Motion for injunctive relief page 4
Bauer's motion for more definite statement
Bauer's objection to motion for injunctive relief
Defendant's motion for order of the court demanding a more definite statement
Plaintiff complains about Bauer's motion for more definitive statement
Callier vs Bauer order of the court(2)
